<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<link>http://carbonphallusy.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Gulf Spill Presents A Slippery Problem</title>
		<link>http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=150</link>
		<comments>http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=150#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zehaas</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width=300 align=right src="http://imgur.com/ntDFE.jpg" title="Satellite view of the Gulf oil spill as seen from space, May 24th, 2010" />Whenever you have any substance, toxic or not, you are going to have accidents.  When the accidents happen, a PLAN must  pre-exist so that action can be immediately taken.  </p>
<p>Instead, our illustrious leader, Obama, chose to ignore advice of industry experts, go on a personal vacation, and then, authorize only a fraction of the resources requested to handle the spill, at which point was weeks after the april 20th explosion on the BP Horizon oil rig. The Gulf residents are unimpressed by the performance of this administration.  Obama didn&#8217;t even visit the gulf until six weeks after the accident. </p>
<p>Of particular interest about the public reaction: A CHICAGO NBC poll result shows that 80% of the CHICAGO locals are &#8220;Furious&#8221; about the President&#8217;s handling of this crisis.  Okay, bear in mind Chicago is Obama&#8217;s home town, and NBC is essentially a propaganda arm of the Obama administration, and the poll STILL shows the people are furious.</p>
<table width=240  bgcolor="darkslategrey" align=right border=1>
<tr>
<td><font color="pink" size=3>let&#8217;s say, on the bright side, this should generate a lot of temporary jobs for the cleanup, which should help local economies.</table>
<p>NOW what&#8217;s being done seems too little and too late to save the gulf beaches, and well, let&#8217;s say, on the bright side, this should generate a lot of temporary jobs for the cleanup, which should help local economies.</p>
<p>CAUTION is needed at this point, not just with the technical difficulties of cleanup, but with what is bound to be a backlash against ALL energy exploration in domestic waters.<br />
<img width=300 align=left src="http://imgur.com/JLrYO.jpg" title="Anchor-handling tugboats battle the blazing remnants of the off shore oil rig Deepwater Horizon." /><br />
Indeed, if I were a &#8220;Greenie&#8221;, this would be my life&#8217;s dream realized. Forever more, even above the disaster of the Exxon Valdez, I will have something to point at and say, &#8220;I told you so!&#8221;  every time &#8220;Big Oil&#8221; tries to do more drilling. </p>
<p>Be very clear.  For our country&#8217;s economic health we NEED energy independence.  We have to keep developing and exploring, or we will forever rely for our energy and economy on countries that overtly hate the United States of America and its interests.</p>
<p>The lesson learned:  Do everything we can to prevent accidents.  Have a plan in place to correct the inevitable accidents, and do NOT ever stop trying to become energy-independent as a nation.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carbonphallusy.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=150</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March on Washington</title>
		<link>http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=149</link>
		<comments>http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=149#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[TC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[9/12]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[march]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> <img src="http://images.eventbrite.com/logos/356965694.gif" style="width: 450px; height: 200px" width="450" height="200" /></p>
<p>Come join us In Washington DC and let your voices be heard on out-of-control government spending and taxation. We have a government that will advance its ideology at our expense. We can no longer afford new government programs. Protest is a time honored tradition, it&#8217;s time to join that tradition.</p>
<p>There will be two members of Carbon Phallusy attending this march. We will be protesting climate change regulation as well as the above mentioned items.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carbonphallusy.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=149</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawaii Demands Solar Water Heaters</title>
		<link>http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=147</link>
		<comments>http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=147#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[TC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hawaii]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar heater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tell me if my math is right here. $5000 for the heater tacked to a 25-year mortgage. That would be 6% interested times $5000 = $300 annually. Spread that over 25 years and that turns the $300 into $7500, so that makes the total cost of the heater $12,500.According to solarpay.com.au the lifespan of a water heater is 10-15 years, while the solar collector itself will last 20-30 years. It seems that about time you finish paying that $12,500 for the solar water heating system, it's going to be time to replace the unit. For myself, I see the 20-30 year lifespan of the collector to be on the high end.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carbonphallusy.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=147</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electric Cars go cold</title>
		<link>http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=145</link>
		<comments>http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=145#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[TC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chevy volt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electric Car]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hybrid car]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[volt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document" /><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 9" /><meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 9" /></p>
<p><a href="http://carbonphallusy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chevy-volt-hh-001.jpg" rel="lightbox[145]" title="chevy-volt-hh-001.jpg"><img src="http://carbonphallusy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chevy-volt-hh-001.jpg" alt="chevy-volt-hh-001.jpg" width="230" align="right" height="157" /></a></p>
<link href="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Owner/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/msoclip1/01/clip_filelist.xml" rel="File-List" /><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>     Normal   0      </xml><![endif]--><br />
<style>  </style>
<p>Now that we have a new president that is interested in solving the so-called problems of global warming, it&#8217;s made me start thinking once more about the electric car. Also, since we are having some of the coldest weather in recent years, I began to think about what it takes to heat that electric car.</p>
<p>In conventional cars with an ICE (internal combustion engine) we use waste heat from the cooling system to keep us warm in the</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carbonphallusy.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=145</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hydrogen For The Road</title>
		<link>http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=144</link>
		<comments>http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=144#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[TC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonphallusy.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document" /><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 9" /><meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 9" /></p>
<link href="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Owner/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/msoclip1/01/clip_filelist.xml" rel="File-List" /><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>     Normal   0      </xml><![endif]--><br />
<style>  </style>
<p><a href="http://carbonphallusy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/hydrogen_fuel.jpg" rel="lightbox[144]" title="Typical hydrogen filling station."><img src="http://carbonphallusy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/hydrogen_fuel.jpg" alt="Typical hydrogen filling station." width="141" align="left" height="190" /></a>We have talked about hydrogen cars before. This is coming to my attention again since a friend has been experimenting with extracting hydrogen from water to increase the mileage for his truck. He has the process working, but there are some problems. The biggest is heat generation. As the water heats up, due to electrolysis, the electrical current goes up. There are ways to dissipate the heat, but that doesn&#8217;t solve the problem completely. Heat is loss, therefore lowering the efficiency of the process. The more loss of energy you have, the less chance at a successful project.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carbonphallusy.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=144</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
